Hunter 31-2 vs Moore 30
How do the Hunter 31-2 and Moore 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 31-2 
Moore 30 | Hunter 31-2 | Moore 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 28.1 ft8.56 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Beam | 11.1 ft3.38 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 8,505 lb3,858 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Ballast | 2,571 lb1,166 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 351 ft²32.6 m² | 465 ft²43.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.48 | 46.87 |
| Displacement / Length | 171 | 49 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.6 | 3.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 4.44 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 6.9 |
Hunter 31-2 vs Moore 30: the short version
- The Hunter 31-2 and Moore 30 are close in length (30.0 ft9.14 m vs 30.0 ft9.14 m ).
- The Hunter 31-2 is heavier, displacing about 325% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Moore 30 carries the more powerful rig (46.9 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 31-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 31-2 rates better for offshore work (2.17 vs 4.44).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.