Hunter 340 vs Tartan 33
How do the Hunter 340 and Tartan 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 340 | Hunter 340 | Tartan 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.8 ft10.29 m | 33.7 ft10.26 m |
| Waterline length | 28.6 ft8.71 m | 28.8 ft8.79 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.56 m | 11.0 ft3.34 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.6 ft1.39 m |
| Displacement | 11,030 lb5,003 kg | 10,000 lb4,536 kg |
| Ballast | 4,100 lb1,860 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Sail area | 599 ft²55.6 m² | 531 ft²49.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.34 | 18.30 |
| Displacement / Length | 211 | 186 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.5 | 21.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.10 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.2 |
Hunter 340 vs Tartan 33: the short version
- The Hunter 340 and Tartan 33 are close in length (33.8 ft10.29 m vs 33.7 ft10.26 m ).
- The Hunter 340 is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 340 carries the more powerful rig (19.3 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 340 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Tartan 33 rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.