Hunter 36 Legend vs Pilot 35
How do the Hunter 36 Legend and Pilot 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 36 Legend 
Pilot 35 | Hunter 36 Legend | Pilot 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.7 ft10.89 m | 35.8 ft10.90 m |
| Waterline length | 31.5 ft9.61 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Beam | 12.3 ft3.76 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 6.8 ft2.08 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 14,330 lb6,500 kg | 13,700 lb6,214 kg |
| Ballast | 5,132 lb2,328 kg | 4,600 lb2,087 kg |
| Sail area | 632 ft²58.7 m² | 550 ft²51.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.14 | 15.37 |
| Displacement / Length | 204 | 391 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.8 | 37.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 1.59 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 6.7 |
Hunter 36 Legend vs Pilot 35: the short version
- The Hunter 36 Legend and Pilot 35 are close in length (35.7 ft10.89 m vs 35.8 ft10.90 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 36 Legend carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pilot 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pilot 35 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.