Hunter 386 vs Yankee 38
How do the Hunter 386 and Yankee 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 386 
Yankee 38 | Hunter 386 | Yankee 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 38.3 ft11.66 m | 38.2 ft11.63 m |
| Waterline length | 32.0 ft9.75 m | 28.8 ft8.76 m |
| Beam | 12.6 ft3.83 m | 11.8 ft3.58 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Displacement | 16,000 lb7,257 kg | 16,000 lb7,257 kg |
| Ballast | 5,900 lb2,676 kg | 7,327 lb3,323 kg |
| Sail area | 740 ft²68.7 m² | 638 ft²59.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.65 | 16.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 218 | 301 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.0 | 29.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 1.87 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 7.2 |
Hunter 386 vs Yankee 38: the short version
- The Hunter 386 and Yankee 38 are close in length (38.3 ft11.66 m vs 38.2 ft11.63 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 386 carries the more powerful rig (18.6 vs 16.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Yankee 38 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Yankee 38 rates better for offshore work (1.87 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.