Hunter 39 vs Islander 40
How do the Hunter 39 and Islander 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 39 | Hunter 39 | Islander 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.4 ft12.02 m | 39.5 ft12.05 m |
| Waterline length | 34.7 ft10.57 m | 30.8 ft9.40 m |
| Beam | 12.9 ft3.94 m | 11.8 ft3.61 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.2 ft2.19 m |
| Displacement | 18,077 lb8,200 kg | 17,000 lb7,711 kg |
| Ballast | 5,603 lb2,541 kg | 7,700 lb3,493 kg |
| Sail area | 738 ft²68.6 m² | 734 ft²68.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.14 | 17.76 |
| Displacement / Length | 194 | 259 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.6 | 29.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.97 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.9 | 7.4 |
Hunter 39 vs Islander 40: the short version
- The Hunter 39 and Islander 40 are close in length (39.4 ft12.02 m vs 39.5 ft12.05 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Islander 40 carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Islander 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Islander 40 rates better for offshore work (1.84 vs 1.97).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.