Hunter 40.5 vs Wilderness 40
How do the Hunter 40.5 and Wilderness 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 40.5 | Hunter 40.5 | Wilderness 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.2 ft12.24 m | 40.0 ft12.19 m |
| Waterline length | 35.3 ft10.77 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 12.4 ft3.79 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 20,000 lb9,072 kg | 9,000 lb4,082 kg |
| Ballast | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 3,969 lb1,800 kg |
| Sail area | 760 ft²70.6 m² | 597 ft²55.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.50 | 22.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 202 | 123 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.3 | 14.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 2.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 7.6 |
Hunter 40.5 vs Wilderness 40: the short version
- The Hunter 40.5 and Wilderness 40 are close in length (40.2 ft12.24 m vs 40.0 ft12.19 m ).
- The Hunter 40.5 is heavier, displacing about 122% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Wilderness 40 carries the more powerful rig (22.1 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 40.5 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 40.5 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 2.31).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.