Hunter 45 DS vs New Zealand 45
How do the Hunter 45 DS and New Zealand 45 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 45 DS 
New Zealand 45 | Hunter 45 DS | New Zealand 45 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 44.8 ft13.66 m | 45.0 ft13.72 m |
| Waterline length | 39.2 ft11.94 m | 36.5 ft11.13 m |
| Beam | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 13.8 ft4.19 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Displacement | 22,937 lb10,404 kg | 22,000 lb9,979 kg |
| Ballast | 7,238 lb3,283 kg | 10,515 lb4,770 kg |
| Sail area | 833 ft²77.4 m² | 900 ft²83.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.51 | 18.34 |
| Displacement / Length | 170 | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.6 | 26.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.4 | 8.1 |
Hunter 45 DS vs New Zealand 45: the short version
- The Hunter 45 DS and New Zealand 45 are close in length (44.8 ft13.66 m vs 45.0 ft13.72 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the New Zealand 45 carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The New Zealand 45 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the New Zealand 45 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.