Hunter Passage 450 vs Kalik 44
How do the Hunter Passage 450 and Kalik 44 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter Passage 450 | Hunter Passage 450 | Kalik 44 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 44.3 ft13.49 m | 44.0 ft13.41 m |
| Waterline length | 38.6 ft11.76 m | 37.1 ft11.30 m |
| Beam | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 13.8 ft4.19 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 26,180 lb11,875 kg | 25,000 lb11,340 kg |
| Ballast | 9,680 lb4,391 kg | 10,600 lb4,808 kg |
| Sail area | 884 ft²82.1 m² | 913 ft²84.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.04 | 17.09 |
| Displacement / Length | 204 | 219 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.9 | 30.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.89 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.3 | 8.2 |
Hunter Passage 450 vs Kalik 44: the short version
- The Hunter Passage 450 and Kalik 44 are close in length (44.3 ft13.49 m vs 44.0 ft13.41 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Kalik 44 carries the more powerful rig (17.1 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Kalik 44 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Kalik 44 rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 1.89).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.