Hurley 18 vs Sandpiper 565
How do the Hurley 18 and Sandpiper 565 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hurley 18 
Sandpiper 565 | Hurley 18 | Sandpiper 565 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.5 ft5.63 m | 18.5 ft5.64 m |
| Waterline length | 14.1 ft4.30 m | 15.0 ft4.57 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.99 m | 7.1 ft2.16 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft0.99 m | 2.9 ft0.88 m |
| Displacement | 2,337 lb1,060 kg | 1,200 lb544 kg |
| Ballast | 1,001 lb454 kg | 300 lb136 kg |
| Sail area | 180 ft²16.7 m² | 154 ft²14.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.35 | 21.82 |
| Displacement / Length | 371 | 159 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.2 | 8.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.97 | 2.67 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Average used price | €2,000 | — |
Hurley 18 vs Sandpiper 565: the short version
- The Hurley 18 and Sandpiper 565 are close in length (18.5 ft5.63 m vs 18.5 ft5.64 m ).
- The Hurley 18 is heavier, displacing about 95% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sandpiper 565 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hurley 18 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hurley 18 rates better for offshore work (1.97 vs 2.67).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.