Hurley 18 vs Typhoon 18
How do the Hurley 18 and Typhoon 18 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hurley 18 | Hurley 18 | Typhoon 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.5 ft5.63 m | 18.5 ft5.64 m |
| Waterline length | 14.1 ft4.30 m | 13.5 ft4.11 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.99 m | 6.3 ft1.92 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft0.99 m | 2.6 ft0.79 m |
| Displacement | 2,337 lb1,060 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Ballast | 1,001 lb454 kg | 900 lb408 kg |
| Sail area | 180 ft²16.7 m² | 155 ft²14.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.35 | 15.62 |
| Displacement / Length | 371 | 363 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.2 | 17.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.97 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 4.9 |
| Average used price | €2,000 | — |
Hurley 18 vs Typhoon 18: the short version
- The Hurley 18 and Typhoon 18 are close in length (18.5 ft5.63 m vs 18.5 ft5.64 m ).
- The Hurley 18 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hurley 18 carries the more powerful rig (16.4 vs 15.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hurley 18 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hurley 18 rates better for offshore work (1.97 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.