Hurley 18 vs Victoria 18
How do the Hurley 18 and Victoria 18 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hurley 18 | Hurley 18 | Victoria 18 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 18.5 ft5.63 m | 18.5 ft5.64 m |
| Waterline length | 14.1 ft4.30 m | 12.8 ft3.91 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.99 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft0.99 m | 2.0 ft0.61 m |
| Displacement | 2,337 lb1,060 kg | 1,200 lb544 kg |
| Ballast | 1,001 lb454 kg | 550 lb249 kg |
| Sail area | 180 ft²16.7 m² | 137 ft²12.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.35 | 19.41 |
| Displacement / Length | 371 | 254 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.2 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.97 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 4.8 |
| Average used price | €2,000 | — |
Hurley 18 vs Victoria 18: the short version
- The Hurley 18 and Victoria 18 are close in length (18.5 ft5.63 m vs 18.5 ft5.64 m ).
- The Hurley 18 is heavier, displacing about 95% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Victoria 18 carries the more powerful rig (19.4 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hurley 18 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hurley 18 rates better for offshore work (1.97 vs 2.07).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.