Interclub Dinghy vs Kite
How do the Interclub Dinghy and Kite compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Interclub Dinghy | Interclub Dinghy | Kite | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 11.6 ft3.53 m |
| Waterline length | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 10.9 ft3.33 m |
| Beam | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 150 lb68 kg | 165 lb75 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 72 ft²6.7 m² | 78 ft²7.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 40.81 | 41.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 44 | 57 |
| Comfort ratio | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Capsize screening | 3.45 | 3.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Interclub Dinghy vs Kite: the short version
- The Interclub Dinghy and Kite are close in length (11.5 ft3.51 m vs 11.6 ft3.53 m ).
- The Kite is heavier, displacing about 10% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Kite carries the more powerful rig (41.5 vs 40.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Kite scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Interclub Dinghy rates better for offshore work (3.45 vs 3.65).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.