Interclub Dinghy vs Magnum Fun 350
How do the Interclub Dinghy and Magnum Fun 350 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Interclub Dinghy | Interclub Dinghy | Magnum Fun 350 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 11.7 ft3.55 m |
| Waterline length | 11.5 ft3.51 m | —— |
| Beam | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 2.1 ft0.64 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | —— |
| Displacement | 150 lb68 kg | 37 lb17 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 72 ft²6.7 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 40.81 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 44 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 2.7 | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.45 | 2.52 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.5 | — |
Interclub Dinghy vs Magnum Fun 350: the short version
- The Interclub Dinghy and Magnum Fun 350 are close in length (11.5 ft3.51 m vs 11.7 ft3.55 m ).
- The Interclub Dinghy is heavier, displacing about 305% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Magnum Fun 350 rates better for offshore work (2.52 vs 3.45).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.