International 210 vs Pearson 26
How do the International 210 and Pearson 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
International 210 
Pearson 26 | International 210 | Pearson 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.09 m | 26.2 ft7.98 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 21.7 ft6.61 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 8.7 ft2.64 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 2,300 lb1,043 kg | 5,400 lb2,449 kg |
| Ballast | 1,145 lb519 kg | 2,200 lb998 kg |
| Sail area | 285 ft²26.5 m² | 322 ft²29.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.17 | 16.74 |
| Displacement / Length | 90 | 237 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.7 | 20.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.77 | 1.98 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.2 |
International 210 vs Pearson 26: the short version
- The International 210 is the larger boat at 29.8 ft9.09 m LOA versus 26.2 ft7.98 m for the Pearson 26.
- The Pearson 26 is heavier, displacing about 135% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the International 210 carries the more powerful rig (26.2 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the International 210 rates better for offshore work (1.77 vs 1.98).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.