International 210 vs Pearson 28
How do the International 210 and Pearson 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
International 210 
Pearson 28 | International 210 | Pearson 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.09 m | 28.5 ft8.67 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 24.5 ft7.46 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 2,300 lb1,043 kg | 7,000 lb3,175 kg |
| Ballast | 1,145 lb519 kg | 3,530 lb1,601 kg |
| Sail area | 285 ft²26.5 m² | 392 ft²36.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.17 | 17.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 90 | 213 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.7 | 20.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.77 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.6 |
International 210 vs Pearson 28: the short version
- The International 210 is the larger boat at 29.8 ft9.09 m LOA versus 28.5 ft8.67 m for the Pearson 28.
- The Pearson 28 is heavier, displacing about 204% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the International 210 carries the more powerful rig (26.2 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the International 210 rates better for offshore work (1.77 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.