International 210 vs Pearson Electra
How do the International 210 and Pearson Electra compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
International 210 | International 210 | Pearson Electra | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.09 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 16.8 ft5.11 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 2,300 lb1,043 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Ballast | 1,145 lb519 kg | 1,299 lb589 kg |
| Sail area | 285 ft²26.5 m² | 228 ft²21.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.17 | 17.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 90 | 285 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.7 | 18.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.77 | 1.94 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 5.5 |
International 210 vs Pearson Electra: the short version
- The International 210 is the larger boat at 29.8 ft9.09 m LOA versus 22.5 ft6.86 m for the Pearson Electra.
- The Pearson Electra is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the International 210 carries the more powerful rig (26.2 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson Electra scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the International 210 rates better for offshore work (1.77 vs 1.94).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.