International 210 vs Pearson Vanguard
How do the International 210 and Pearson Vanguard compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
International 210 | International 210 | Pearson Vanguard | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.09 m | 32.8 ft10.00 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 22.4 ft6.83 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 9.3 ft2.83 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 2,300 lb1,043 kg | 10,300 lb4,672 kg |
| Ballast | 1,145 lb519 kg | 4,250 lb1,928 kg |
| Sail area | 285 ft²26.5 m² | 469 ft²43.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.17 | 15.85 |
| Displacement / Length | 90 | 409 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.7 | 32.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.77 | 1.71 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.3 |
International 210 vs Pearson Vanguard: the short version
- The Pearson Vanguard is the larger boat at 32.8 ft10.00 m LOA versus 29.8 ft9.09 m for the International 210.
- The Pearson Vanguard is heavier, displacing about 348% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the International 210 carries the more powerful rig (26.2 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson Vanguard scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pearson Vanguard rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 1.77).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.