International 210 vs Triton 25
How do the International 210 and Triton 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
International 210 | International 210 | Triton 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.09 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Waterline length | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 21.4 ft6.53 m |
| Beam | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.78 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 2,300 lb1,043 kg | 3,750 lb1,701 kg |
| Ballast | 1,145 lb519 kg | 1,250 lb567 kg |
| Sail area | 285 ft²26.5 m² | 257 ft²23.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.17 | 17.04 |
| Displacement / Length | 90 | 170 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.7 | 16.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.77 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.2 |
International 210 vs Triton 25: the short version
- The International 210 is the larger boat at 29.8 ft9.09 m LOA versus 25.0 ft7.62 m for the Triton 25.
- The Triton 25 is heavier, displacing about 63% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the International 210 carries the more powerful rig (26.2 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Triton 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the International 210 rates better for offshore work (1.77 vs 2.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.