Invader 36 vs Pilot 35
How do the Invader 36 and Pilot 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Invader 36 | Invader 36 | Pilot 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.8 ft10.90 m | 35.8 ft10.90 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.39 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.79 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 10,550 lb4,785 kg | 13,700 lb6,214 kg |
| Ballast | 3,800 lb1,724 kg | 4,600 lb2,087 kg |
| Sail area | 504 ft²46.8 m² | 550 ft²51.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.76 | 15.37 |
| Displacement / Length | 330 | 391 |
| Comfort ratio | 30.8 | 37.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.67 | 1.59 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Invader 36 vs Pilot 35: the short version
- The Invader 36 and Pilot 35 are close in length (35.8 ft10.90 m vs 35.8 ft10.90 m ).
- The Pilot 35 is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Invader 36 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pilot 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pilot 35 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 1.67).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.