Irwin 41 Citation vs Lord Nelson 41
How do the Irwin 41 Citation and Lord Nelson 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Irwin 41 Citation | Irwin 41 Citation | Lord Nelson 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.8 ft12.43 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Waterline length | 33.3 ft10.14 m | 36.2 ft11.03 m |
| Beam | 13.0 ft3.97 m | 12.8 ft3.91 m |
| Draft | 7.3 ft2.21 m | 5.7 ft1.73 m |
| Displacement | 17,500 lb7,938 kg | 30,500 lb13,835 kg |
| Ballast | 9,500 lb4,309 kg | 11,000 lb4,990 kg |
| Sail area | 787 ft²73.1 m² | 1,046 ft²97.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.68 | 17.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 212 | 287 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.9 | 41.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.7 | 8.1 |
Irwin 41 Citation vs Lord Nelson 41: the short version
- The Irwin 41 Citation and Lord Nelson 41 are close in length (40.8 ft12.43 m vs 41.0 ft12.50 m ).
- The Lord Nelson 41 is heavier, displacing about 74% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Irwin 41 Citation carries the more powerful rig (18.7 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Lord Nelson 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Lord Nelson 41 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.