Irwin 41 Citation vs Newport 41
How do the Irwin 41 Citation and Newport 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Irwin 41 Citation | Irwin 41 Citation | Newport 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.8 ft12.43 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Waterline length | 33.3 ft10.14 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 13.0 ft3.97 m | 11.3 ft3.43 m |
| Draft | 7.3 ft2.21 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Displacement | 17,500 lb7,938 kg | 18,000 lb8,165 kg |
| Ballast | 9,500 lb4,309 kg | 8,215 lb3,726 kg |
| Sail area | 787 ft²73.1 m² | 741 ft²68.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.68 | 17.26 |
| Displacement / Length | 212 | 298 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.9 | 33.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.7 | 7.3 |
Irwin 41 Citation vs Newport 41: the short version
- The Irwin 41 Citation and Newport 41 are close in length (40.8 ft12.43 m vs 41.0 ft12.50 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Irwin 41 Citation carries the more powerful rig (18.7 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Newport 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Newport 41 rates better for offshore work (1.72 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.