Island Packet 27 vs Island Packet 35
How do the Island Packet 27 and Island Packet 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Island Packet 27 | Island Packet 27 | Island Packet 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.5 ft8.08 m | 35.3 ft10.77 m |
| Waterline length | 24.3 ft7.39 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 10.5 ft3.20 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.13 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 8,000 lb3,629 kg | 17,500 lb7,938 kg |
| Ballast | 3,000 lb1,361 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Sail area | 405 ft²37.6 m² | 639 ft²59.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.20 | 15.17 |
| Displacement / Length | 250 | 289 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.6 | 31.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.10 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.3 |
Island Packet 27 vs Island Packet 35: the short version
- The Island Packet 35 is the larger boat at 35.3 ft10.77 m LOA versus 26.5 ft8.08 m for the Island Packet 27.
- The Island Packet 35 is heavier, displacing about 119% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Island Packet 27 carries the more powerful rig (16.2 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Island Packet 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Island Packet 35 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.