Island Packet 29 vs Mirage 29
How do the Island Packet 29 and Mirage 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Island Packet 29 
Mirage 29 | Island Packet 29 | Mirage 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.0 ft8.84 m | 29.0 ft8.84 m |
| Waterline length | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 24.3 ft7.39 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.30 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.8 ft1.47 m |
| Displacement | 10,900 lb4,944 kg | 6,800 lb3,084 kg |
| Ballast | 4,800 lb2,177 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Sail area | 491 ft²45.6 m² | 375 ft²34.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.98 | 16.72 |
| Displacement / Length | 291 | 213 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.5 | 17.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 2.22 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | 6.6 |
Island Packet 29 vs Mirage 29: the short version
- The Island Packet 29 and Mirage 29 are close in length (29.0 ft8.84 m vs 29.0 ft8.84 m ).
- The Island Packet 29 is heavier, displacing about 60% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Mirage 29 carries the more powerful rig (16.7 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Island Packet 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Island Packet 29 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 2.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.