Island Packet 35 vs Southern Cross 35
How do the Island Packet 35 and Southern Cross 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Island Packet 35 | Island Packet 35 | Southern Cross 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.3 ft10.77 m | 35.3 ft10.74 m |
| Waterline length | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Beam | 12.0 ft3.66 m | 11.4 ft3.48 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 17,500 lb7,938 kg | 17,700 lb8,029 kg |
| Ballast | 8,000 lb3,629 kg | 5,750 lb2,608 kg |
| Sail area | 639 ft²59.4 m² | 627 ft²58.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.17 | 14.77 |
| Displacement / Length | 289 | 360 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.3 | 35.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.85 | 1.75 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.1 |
Island Packet 35 vs Southern Cross 35: the short version
- The Island Packet 35 and Southern Cross 35 are close in length (35.3 ft10.77 m vs 35.3 ft10.74 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Island Packet 35 carries the more powerful rig (15.2 vs 14.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Southern Cross 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Southern Cross 35 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 1.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.