J/22 vs Pearson Electra
How do the J/22 and Pearson Electra compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
J/22 
Pearson Electra | J/22 | Pearson Electra | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.5 ft6.86 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Waterline length | 19.0 ft5.79 m | 16.8 ft5.11 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.16 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 1,790 lb812 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Ballast | 700 lb318 kg | 1,299 lb589 kg |
| Sail area | 227 ft²21.1 m² | 228 ft²21.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.64 | 17.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 117 | 285 |
| Comfort ratio | 8.6 | 18.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.64 | 1.94 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.5 |
J/22 vs Pearson Electra: the short version
- The J/22 and Pearson Electra are close in length (22.5 ft6.86 m vs 22.5 ft6.86 m ).
- The Pearson Electra is heavier, displacing about 68% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the J/22 carries the more powerful rig (24.6 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Pearson Electra scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Pearson Electra rates better for offshore work (1.94 vs 2.64).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.