J/32 vs Nonsuch 324
How do the J/32 and Nonsuch 324 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
J/32 
Nonsuch 324 | J/32 | Nonsuch 324 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.4 ft9.88 m | 32.3 ft9.85 m |
| Waterline length | 29.0 ft8.84 m | 28.8 ft8.76 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 11.8 ft3.61 m |
| Draft | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 10,000 lb4,536 kg | 11,500 lb5,216 kg |
| Ballast | 3,840 lb1,742 kg | 4,240 lb1,923 kg |
| Sail area | 514 ft²47.8 m² | 689 ft²64.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.72 | 21.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 183 | 216 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.1 | 22.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.2 |
J/32 vs Nonsuch 324: the short version
- The J/32 and Nonsuch 324 are close in length (32.4 ft9.88 m vs 32.3 ft9.85 m ).
- The Nonsuch 324 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nonsuch 324 carries the more powerful rig (21.6 vs 17.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nonsuch 324 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the J/32 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.