Jibe vs Kanga 300
How do the Jibe and Kanga 300 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Jibe | Jibe | Kanga 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.0 ft0.62 m | 2.0 ft0.62 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 29 lb13 kg | 25 lb11 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.64 | 2.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Jibe vs Kanga 300: the short version
- The Jibe and Kanga 300 are close in length (9.8 ft3.00 m vs 9.8 ft3.00 m ).
- The Jibe is heavier, displacing about 16% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Jibe rates better for offshore work (2.64 vs 2.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.