Jouët 760 vs Kelt 7.6
How do the Jouët 760 and Kelt 7.6 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Jouët 760 
Kelt 7.6 | Jouët 760 | Kelt 7.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.9 ft7.60 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Waterline length | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 9.4 ft2.88 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 4,850 lb2,200 kg | 4,188 lb1,900 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,631 lb740 kg |
| Sail area | 277 ft²25.7 m² | 273 ft²25.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.47 | 16.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 223 | 202 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.4 | 14.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 2.34 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.1 |
Jouët 760 vs Kelt 7.6: the short version
- The Jouët 760 and Kelt 7.6 are close in length (24.9 ft7.60 m vs 24.9 ft7.60 m ).
- The Jouët 760 is heavier, displacing about 16% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Kelt 7.6 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Jouët 760 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Jouët 760 rates better for offshore work (2.17 vs 2.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.