Junker 22 vs Marlow-Hunter 22
How do the Junker 22 and Marlow-Hunter 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Junker 22 | Junker 22 | Marlow-Hunter 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.50 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Beam | 6.6 ft2.00 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | —— | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,866 lb1,300 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 500 lb227 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 215 ft²20.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.26 | 24.15 |
| Displacement / Length | 218 | 115 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.0 | 8.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.85 | 2.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.8 |
| Average used price | €1,500 | — |
Junker 22 vs Marlow-Hunter 22: the short version
- The Junker 22 and Marlow-Hunter 22 are close in length (21.3 ft6.50 m vs 21.3 ft6.50 m ).
- The Junker 22 is heavier, displacing about 69% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Marlow-Hunter 22 carries the more powerful rig (24.2 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Junker 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Junker 22 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.65).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.