K2 vs K3
How do the K2 and K3 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
K2 | K2 | K3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 17.0 ft5.18 m | 16.1 ft4.91 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.3 ft2.21 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 342 lb155 kg | 304 lb138 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 171 ft²15.9 m² | 160 ft²14.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 55.95 | 56.62 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 4.58 | 4.31 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
K2 vs K3: the short version
- The K2 is the larger boat at 17.0 ft5.18 m LOA versus 16.1 ft4.91 m for the K3.
- The K2 is heavier, displacing about 13% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the K3 carries the more powerful rig (56.6 vs 55.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the K3 rates better for offshore work (4.31 vs 4.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.