K2 vs Spitfire 2.3
How do the K2 and Spitfire 2.3 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
K2 | K2 | Spitfire 2.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 17.0 ft5.18 m | 18.0 ft5.49 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 342 lb155 kg | 397 lb180 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 171 ft²15.9 m² | 180 ft²16.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 55.95 | 53.32 |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 4.58 | 4.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
K2 vs Spitfire 2.3: the short version
- The Spitfire 2.3 is the larger boat at 18.0 ft5.49 m LOA versus 17.0 ft5.18 m for the K2.
- The Spitfire 2.3 is heavier, displacing about 16% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the K2 carries the more powerful rig (55.9 vs 53.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Spitfire 2.3 rates better for offshore work (4.46 vs 4.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.