K2 vs Vagabond 17
How do the K2 and Vagabond 17 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
K2 | K2 | Vagabond 17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 17.0 ft5.18 m | 17.0 ft5.18 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 15.0 ft4.57 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 7.3 ft2.21 m |
| Draft | —— | 4.2 ft1.27 m |
| Displacement | 342 lb155 kg | 950 lb431 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 345 lb156 kg |
| Sail area | 171 ft²15.9 m² | 140 ft²13.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 55.95 | 23.18 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 126 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 6.7 |
| Capsize screening | 4.58 | 2.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.2 |
K2 vs Vagabond 17: the short version
- The K2 and Vagabond 17 are close in length (17.0 ft5.18 m vs 17.0 ft5.18 m ).
- The Vagabond 17 is heavier, displacing about 178% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the K2 carries the more powerful rig (55.9 vs 23.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Vagabond 17 rates better for offshore work (2.95 vs 4.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.