Kanga 300 vs Oceanite V 300
How do the Kanga 300 and Oceanite V 300 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Kanga 300 | Kanga 300 | Oceanite V 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.0 ft0.62 m | 1.8 ft0.56 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 25 lb11 kg | 26 lb12 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.78 | 2.48 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Kanga 300 vs Oceanite V 300: the short version
- The Kanga 300 and Oceanite V 300 are close in length (9.8 ft3.00 m vs 9.8 ft3.00 m ).
- By the capsize screening formula the Oceanite V 300 rates better for offshore work (2.48 vs 2.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.