Kanga 300 vs Slalom Gun
How do the Kanga 300 and Slalom Gun compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Kanga 300 | Kanga 300 | Slalom Gun | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 9.8 ft3.00 m | 9.8 ft2.98 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.0 ft0.62 m | 1.9 ft0.57 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 25 lb11 kg | 20 lb9 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.78 | 2.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Kanga 300 vs Slalom Gun: the short version
- The Kanga 300 and Slalom Gun are close in length (9.8 ft3.00 m vs 9.8 ft2.98 m ).
- The Kanga 300 is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Slalom Gun rates better for offshore work (2.76 vs 2.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.