Kirby 23 vs Paceship 23
How do the Kirby 23 and Paceship 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Kirby 23 
Paceship 23 | Kirby 23 | Paceship 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Waterline length | 18.8 ft5.73 m | 19.0 ft5.79 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.19 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 2,400 lb1,089 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Ballast | 900 lb408 kg | 900 lb408 kg |
| Sail area | 273 ft²25.4 m² | 225 ft²20.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.37 | 20.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 161 | 150 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.1 | 11.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.32 | 2.42 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Kirby 23 vs Paceship 23: the short version
- The Kirby 23 and Paceship 23 are close in length (23.0 ft7.01 m vs 23.0 ft7.01 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Kirby 23 carries the more powerful rig (24.4 vs 20.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Kirby 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Kirby 23 rates better for offshore work (2.32 vs 2.42).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.