Kite vs Magnum Fun 350
How do the Kite and Magnum Fun 350 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Kite | Kite | Magnum Fun 350 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 11.6 ft3.53 m | 11.7 ft3.55 m |
| Waterline length | 10.9 ft3.33 m | —— |
| Beam | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 2.1 ft0.64 m |
| Draft | 3.0 ft0.91 m | —— |
| Displacement | 165 lb75 kg | 37 lb17 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 78 ft²7.2 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 41.49 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 57 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 2.7 | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.65 | 2.52 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 4.4 | — |
Kite vs Magnum Fun 350: the short version
- The Kite and Magnum Fun 350 are close in length (11.6 ft3.53 m vs 11.7 ft3.55 m ).
- The Kite is heavier, displacing about 346% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Magnum Fun 350 rates better for offshore work (2.52 vs 3.65).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.