Laurin 28 vs Orion 27-2
How do the Laurin 28 and Orion 27-2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Laurin 28 | Laurin 28 | Orion 27-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.4 ft8.34 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Waterline length | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 22.2 ft6.77 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.50 m | 9.2 ft2.81 m |
| Draft | 4.4 ft1.35 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 10,000 lb4,536 kg |
| Ballast | 3,527 lb1,600 kg | 3,300 lb1,497 kg |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 443 ft²41.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 12.40 | 15.27 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 407 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.2 | 33.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.69 | 1.71 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €4,900 | — |
Laurin 28 vs Orion 27-2: the short version
- The Laurin 28 and Orion 27-2 are close in length (27.4 ft8.34 m vs 27.3 ft8.33 m ).
- The Orion 27-2 is heavier, displacing about 37% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Orion 27-2 carries the more powerful rig (15.3 vs 12.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Orion 27-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Laurin 28 rates better for offshore work (1.69 vs 1.71).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.