Le 260 vs Merak Junior
How do the Le 260 and Merak Junior compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Le 260 | Le 260 | Merak Junior | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 8.5 ft2.60 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 1.6 ft0.50 m | 2.1 ft0.65 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 13 lb6 kg | 26 lb12 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.79 | 2.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Le 260 vs Merak Junior: the short version
- The Le 260 and Merak Junior are close in length (8.5 ft2.60 m vs 8.5 ft2.60 m ).
- The Merak Junior is heavier, displacing about 100% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Le 260 rates better for offshore work (2.79 vs 2.88).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.