Lido 14 vs Santana 30/30
How do the Lido 14 and Santana 30/30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Lido 14 
Santana 30/30 | Lido 14 | Santana 30/30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 29.9 ft9.12 m |
| Waterline length | 13.8 ft4.19 m | 25.4 ft7.75 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 10.3 ft3.12 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 310 lb141 kg | 6,500 lb2,948 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,310 lb1,048 kg |
| Sail area | 111 ft²10.3 m² | 440 ft²40.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.77 | 20.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 53 | 177 |
| Comfort ratio | 3.2 | 16.9 |
| Capsize screening | 3.55 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 6.8 |
Lido 14 vs Santana 30/30: the short version
- The Santana 30/30 is the larger boat at 29.9 ft9.12 m LOA versus 14.0 ft4.27 m for the Lido 14.
- The Santana 30/30 is heavier, displacing about 1997% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Lido 14 carries the more powerful rig (38.8 vs 20.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 30/30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 30/30 rates better for offshore work (2.20 vs 3.55).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.