Lido 14 vs Santana 39
How do the Lido 14 and Santana 39 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Lido 14 
Santana 39 | Lido 14 | Santana 39 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 39.0 ft11.89 m |
| Waterline length | 13.8 ft4.19 m | 32.0 ft9.75 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 11.7 ft3.56 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 310 lb141 kg | 18,000 lb8,165 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 6,600 lb2,994 kg |
| Sail area | 111 ft²10.3 m² | 686 ft²63.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 38.77 | 15.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 53 | 245 |
| Comfort ratio | 3.2 | 30.9 |
| Capsize screening | 3.55 | 1.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 7.6 |
Lido 14 vs Santana 39: the short version
- The Santana 39 is the larger boat at 39.0 ft11.89 m LOA versus 14.0 ft4.27 m for the Lido 14.
- The Santana 39 is heavier, displacing about 5706% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Lido 14 carries the more powerful rig (38.8 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Santana 39 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Santana 39 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 3.55).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.