Ligier Competition vs Seawolf Competition
How do the Ligier Competition and Seawolf Competition compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Ligier Competition | Seawolf Competition | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.8 ft3.90 m | 12.8 ft3.90 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.3 ft0.70 m | 2.2 ft0.66 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 43 lb20 kg | 40 lb18 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.63 | 2.54 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Ligier Competition vs Seawolf Competition: the short version
- The Ligier Competition and Seawolf Competition are close in length (12.8 ft3.90 m vs 12.8 ft3.90 m ).
- The Ligier Competition is heavier, displacing about 8% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Seawolf Competition rates better for offshore work (2.54 vs 2.63).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.