Lord Nelson 41 vs Newport 41
How do the Lord Nelson 41 and Newport 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Lord Nelson 41 | Lord Nelson 41 | Newport 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 41.0 ft12.50 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Waterline length | 36.2 ft11.03 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 12.8 ft3.91 m | 11.3 ft3.43 m |
| Draft | 5.7 ft1.73 m | 6.3 ft1.91 m |
| Displacement | 30,500 lb13,835 kg | 18,000 lb8,165 kg |
| Ballast | 11,000 lb4,990 kg | 8,215 lb3,726 kg |
| Sail area | 1,046 ft²97.2 m² | 741 ft²68.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.14 | 17.26 |
| Displacement / Length | 287 | 298 |
| Comfort ratio | 41.9 | 33.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.64 | 1.72 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.1 | 7.3 |
Lord Nelson 41 vs Newport 41: the short version
- The Lord Nelson 41 and Newport 41 are close in length (41.0 ft12.50 m vs 41.0 ft12.50 m ).
- The Lord Nelson 41 is heavier, displacing about 69% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Newport 41 carries the more powerful rig (17.3 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Lord Nelson 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Lord Nelson 41 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 1.72).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.