Lord Nelson 41 vs Swan 48 Frers
How do the Lord Nelson 41 and Swan 48 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Lord Nelson 41 
Swan 48 Frers | Lord Nelson 41 | Swan 48 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 41.0 ft12.50 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Waterline length | 36.2 ft11.03 m | 41.0 ft12.50 m |
| Beam | 12.8 ft3.91 m | 14.2 ft4.32 m |
| Draft | 5.7 ft1.73 m | 7.8 ft2.38 m |
| Displacement | 30,500 lb13,835 kg | 31,526 lb14,300 kg |
| Ballast | 11,000 lb4,990 kg | 12,100 lb5,488 kg |
| Sail area | 1,046 ft²97.2 m² | 1,142 ft²106.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.14 | 18.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 287 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 41.9 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.64 | 1.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.1 | 8.6 |
Lord Nelson 41 vs Swan 48 Frers: the short version
- The Lord Nelson 41 and Swan 48 Frers are close in length (41.0 ft12.50 m vs 41.0 ft12.50 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 48 Frers carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Lord Nelson 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Lord Nelson 41 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 1.79).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.