MacGregor 24 vs MacGregor 25
How do the MacGregor 24 and MacGregor 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
MacGregor 24 
MacGregor 25 | MacGregor 24 | MacGregor 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.6 ft7.49 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Waterline length | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.7 ft1.73 m |
| Displacement | 2,100 lb953 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Ballast | 575 lb261 kg | 625 lb283 kg |
| Sail area | 231 ft²21.5 m² | 251 ft²23.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.54 | 24.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 97 | 77 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.47 | 2.47 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.4 |
MacGregor 24 vs MacGregor 25: the short version
- The MacGregor 24 and MacGregor 25 are close in length (24.6 ft7.49 m vs 25.0 ft7.62 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the MacGregor 25 carries the more powerful rig (24.5 vs 22.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The MacGregor 24 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the MacGregor 25 rates better for offshore work (2.47 vs 2.47).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.