MacGregor 24 vs Redline 25
How do the MacGregor 24 and Redline 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
MacGregor 24 
Redline 25 | MacGregor 24 | Redline 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.6 ft7.49 m | 24.6 ft7.49 m |
| Waterline length | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 20.5 ft6.25 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 2,100 lb953 kg | 4,115 lb1,867 kg |
| Ballast | 575 lb261 kg | 1,915 lb869 kg |
| Sail area | 231 ft²21.5 m² | 252 ft²23.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.54 | 15.70 |
| Displacement / Length | 97 | 213 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.2 | 18.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.47 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.1 |
MacGregor 24 vs Redline 25: the short version
- The MacGregor 24 and Redline 25 are close in length (24.6 ft7.49 m vs 24.6 ft7.49 m ).
- The Redline 25 is heavier, displacing about 96% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the MacGregor 24 carries the more powerful rig (22.5 vs 15.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Redline 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Redline 25 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.47).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.