Magnifik Midget vs Marlin 23
How do the Magnifik Midget and Marlin 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Magnifik Midget | Magnifik Midget | Marlin 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.0 ft7.00 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Waterline length | 18.9 ft5.75 m | 16.9 ft5.16 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.12 m | 7.2 ft2.19 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.98 m | 3.3 ft0.99 m |
| Displacement | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Ballast | 1,543 lb700 kg | 1,400 lb635 kg |
| Sail area | 269 ft²25.0 m² | 259 ft²24.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.31 | 19.92 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 276 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.9 | 17.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.5 |
| Average used price | €1,200 | — |
Magnifik Midget vs Marlin 23: the short version
- The Magnifik Midget and Marlin 23 are close in length (23.0 ft7.00 m vs 23.0 ft7.01 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Magnifik Midget carries the more powerful rig (20.3 vs 19.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Magnifik Midget scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Magnifik Midget rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.