Magnifik Midget vs O'Day 23
How do the Magnifik Midget and O'Day 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Magnifik Midget | O'Day 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 23.0 ft7.00 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Waterline length | 18.9 ft5.75 m | 19.5 ft5.94 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.12 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.98 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 3,425 lb1,554 kg |
| Ballast | 1,543 lb700 kg | 1,200 lb544 kg |
| Sail area | 269 ft²25.0 m² | 245 ft²22.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.31 | 17.25 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 206 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.9 | 16.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | €1,200 | — |
Magnifik Midget vs O'Day 23: the short version
- The Magnifik Midget and O'Day 23 are close in length (23.0 ft7.00 m vs 23.0 ft7.01 m ).
- The O'Day 23 is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Magnifik Midget carries the more powerful rig (20.3 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Magnifik Midget scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Magnifik Midget rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
O'Day 23