Mamba 311 vs Sprint 95
How do the Mamba 311 and Sprint 95 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Mamba 311 | Mamba 311 | Sprint 95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.2 ft9.50 m | 31.1 ft9.48 m |
| Waterline length | 26.3 ft8.00 m | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 10.1 ft3.07 m | 9.6 ft2.92 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 4,950 lb2,245 kg |
| Ballast | 3,527 lb1,600 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 560 ft²52.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 23.86 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 180 | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.7 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.08 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 7.0 |
| Average used price | €16,900 | — |
Mamba 311 vs Sprint 95: the short version
- The Mamba 311 and Sprint 95 are close in length (31.2 ft9.50 m vs 31.1 ft9.48 m ).
- The Mamba 311 is heavier, displacing about 47% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Mamba 311 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Mamba 311 rates better for offshore work (2.08 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.