Marieholm 28 (281) vs Omega 28
How do the Marieholm 28 (281) and Omega 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Marieholm 28 (281) | Marieholm 28 (281) | Omega 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.1 ft8.56 m | 28.1 ft8.57 m |
| Waterline length | 23.6 ft7.20 m | 22.3 ft6.80 m |
| Beam | 9.7 ft2.94 m | 9.6 ft2.93 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 8,378 lb3,800 kg | 5,952 lb2,700 kg |
| Ballast | 3,417 lb1,550 kg | 2,646 lb1,200 kg |
| Sail area | 452 ft²42.0 m² | 441 ft²41.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.53 | 21.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 284 | 239 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.3 | 18.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 2.12 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €9,800 | €7,100 |
Marieholm 28 (281) vs Omega 28: the short version
- The Marieholm 28 (281) and Omega 28 are close in length (28.1 ft8.56 m vs 28.1 ft8.57 m ).
- The Marieholm 28 (281) is heavier, displacing about 41% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Omega 28 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Marieholm 28 (281) scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marieholm 28 (281) rates better for offshore work (1.90 vs 2.12).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.