Marieholm 28 (281) vs RJ 85
How do the Marieholm 28 (281) and RJ 85 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Marieholm 28 (281) | Marieholm 28 (281) | RJ 85 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.1 ft8.56 m | 28.1 ft8.55 m |
| Waterline length | 23.6 ft7.20 m | 22.0 ft6.70 m |
| Beam | 9.7 ft2.94 m | 6.7 ft2.05 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 4.1 ft1.26 m |
| Displacement | 8,378 lb3,800 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Ballast | 3,417 lb1,550 kg | 2,646 lb1,200 kg |
| Sail area | 452 ft²42.0 m² | 323 ft²30.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.53 | 18.04 |
| Displacement / Length | 284 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.3 | 24.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.90 | 1.59 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | €9,800 | €4,500 |
Marieholm 28 (281) vs RJ 85: the short version
- The Marieholm 28 (281) and RJ 85 are close in length (28.1 ft8.56 m vs 28.1 ft8.55 m ).
- The Marieholm 28 (281) is heavier, displacing about 73% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the RJ 85 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Marieholm 28 (281) scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the RJ 85 rates better for offshore work (1.59 vs 1.90).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.